From collectibles to cars, buy and sell all kinds of items on eBay
aAdvanced Search
Last Post Apr 15, 2009 1:53 PM by: bumblebee-garden
Replies: 61
)
buriedbybooks
Posts: 2,211

Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:08 AM
What if the item is still in transit when the buyer contacts us?
> If the item is still in transit, eBay will consider the delivery estimate in the listing. If tracking indicates that the item should arrive within the delivery estimate plus a reasonable amount of additional time (3 days in most cases), the buyer will be told to wait and the seller will not be held accountable. If tracking indicates that the item will arrive outside this timeframe or is lost in transit, the seller may be held accountable.

USPS does not offer guaranteed delivery dates on any service but Express.

All of their time frames are AVERAGE delivery time frames.

For services like Media mail and Parcel Post, those delivery time frames are unrealistic AND do not emphasize that those services may received deferred service.

Media mail routinely takes MUCH longer than 2-9 business days--especially during the holidays.

A 3 day delivery 'cushion' is not enough. Especially when the current calculation does not factor in BUSINESS days.

EBay's primary competitor ads a WEEK to delivery estimates. That seems far more reasonable.

And to have a seller's search standing, discounts, Seller Performance score destroyed by the performance of the postal service is beyond comprehension.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
eclectic_salvage
Posts: 2,189
(1 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:20 AM
I agree - it should ba a larger cushion than just 3 days.

And what about destinations/delivery methods that USPS provides NO delivery estimate for - ie media mail to Hawaii or Alaska?


As long as the roots are not severed, all is well. And all will be well in the garden.



Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too dark to read.

Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
clkunz@ebay.com
Posts: 70
(2 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:21 AM
Hi buriedbybooks,

In reviewing not-received claims escalated by buyers, we will take into account the shipping method used by the seller...we understand that some methods (Media Mail among them, as you note) have some variability to them. So the three-day delivery "cushion" is a rule of thumb that we will adjust based on shipping method.

Our intent with this new resolution system is not to reset the thresholds used to evaluate seller performance. In fact, moving to the new system will give eBay customer support agents more latitude to find not-received claims in the sellers favor--as long as the shipping method and a reasonable shipping/handling time estimate are in the listing.

Clay
eBay resolution team
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
buriedbybooks
Posts: 2,211
(3 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:27 AM
Thank you for your response, Clay.

as long as the shipping method and a reasonable shipping/handling time estimate are in the listing.

Is this referring to the eBay provided estimates generated by information in the listing process or information in the description area provided by the seller?

Here's why I ask:

On my listings, USPS media mail is shown as 2-9 business days. 3 weeks is far more accurate. That being said, I have in bold, red letters that USPS media mail can take up to 15 business days for delivery.

Only the USPS provided "estimate" is available for view in My eBay Order Details etc.

Will the resolution staff check the contents of the listing description or will they merely be going by what that tracking information says?
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
chattanooga_family_sales
Posts: 1,651
(4 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:29 AM
And to have a seller's search standing, discounts, Seller Performance score destroyed by the performance of the postal service is beyond comprehension.


EXACTLY! We can't control how long USPS takes to deliver! And what about international shipments???? Anyone whose ever sold international knows that a customs office can and do sometimes hold items for several days =(

If tracking indicates that the item should arrive within the delivery estimate plus a reasonable amount of additional time (3 days in most cases), the buyer will be told to wait and the seller will not be held accountable
Not to mention that USPS does not offer tracking. They only offer Delivery Confirmation - the PO is not required to scan these in at each delivery point so tracking via DC# is reliable. Also USPS website only updates the DC information once a night, if that.
.
.
T.V. - Why do you think they call it programming?

Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
chattanooga_family_sales
Posts: 1,651
(5 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:31 AM
scuse me. Is NOT reliable.
.
.
T.V. - Why do you think they call it programming?

Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
buriedbybooks
Posts: 2,211
(6 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:31 AM
And I will reiterate that a 3 day cushion is not sufficient.

5 business days (ie. a week) would be far more reasonable and is what the competition does.

It is the standard.

If the PO misroutes a Priority Mail package, it usually takes them longer than 3 days to get it delivered to its correct destination.

Also, I am extremely concerned that my Seller Performance can be ruined because I have Item Not Received claims closed against me due to postal delays. I have NO control over the package once it leaves my hands.

I have NO issue with sellers being held accountable for lost packages. That is consistent with the law and current Paypal policy. I vehemently disagree with being held accountable for something I can't control.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
clkunz@ebay.com
Posts: 70
(7 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:33 AM
Hi buriedbybooks,

I need to give a bit of a nuanced answer here. The data we use for the auto-generated handling time comes from USPS, and we use it as an overall framework for figuring out whether an item is late or not.

However: We know that it's an imperfect estimate and Media Mail can take particularly long. So the tracking info is the principal method, but in our reviews we still use judgment. Your extra note to your buyers that media mail can take a while is a good idea for setting buyer expectations too.

Clay
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
lurch-deeann
Posts: 625
(8 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:37 AM
Yeah - I don't get this either. I've had Media Mail take up to 5 weeks to go halfway across the country - and not even in holiday seasons. Two+ weeks is not unheard of. Parcel Post as well. Additionally, this last Christmas, I had one Priority Mail package take 13 days. Thankfully, it arrived on 12/24 (it was a gift for someone's husband, so just made it). Does this mean I would "be held accountable?" And if so, what happens when the package DOES arrive.

Furthermore, USPS does not offer tracking - it's delivery confirmation. Many packages get scanned at drop-off and again at delivery and no where in between (this also happened with the Christmas package referenced above). Why will eBay be setting "buyer expectations" that it is tracking?

And tied to that: international doesn't have tracking for First Class International. And not even for Priority International Flat Rate boxes or envelopes. How will that be handled? Will they automatically be assumed to be lost? And to avoid having eBay rule that it is taking too long on international, will there be a requirement that Priority Mail International then be used (but of course, not any of the flat-rate options)? I thought eBay was trying to get sellers to adopt cheaper shipping options.

Thanks.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
lurch-deeann
Posts: 625
(9 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 10:41 AM
I just saw your follow-up: " The data we use for the auto-generated handling time comes from USPS, and we use it as an overall framework for figuring out whether an item is late or not."

So I have to really reinforce this question - if eBay will be refunding when an item is late due to the carrier, what happens when the item DOES arrive (proved with delivery confirmation) if eBay has already refunded on a shipment that was running late because of the carrier.

Oh - and I might have missed this, but will eBay be automatically monitoring this, or only upon buyer request?

There are times I list stuff (I only use auction format) and something comes up in the week which delays my shipping the item out by a couple of days. I always inform the buyer and tell them to let me know if it is a problem, and I will make every effort to get it out earlier. Buyers have always been cool with this when it has come up, but if eBay will automatically monitor this, even though the buyer was fine with it - we'll have occasional problems.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
clkunz@ebay.com
Posts: 70
(10 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 11:03 AM
Hi lurch-deeann,

Good follow-ups.

In the event buyers contact eBay to complain of a not-received item, our intent is to give them some indication of if/when it will arrive. Note that in some cases, this will enable eBay customer support to steer claims away from sellers, if we can reassure the buyer that not enough time has elapsed.

In the new system we're also trying to preserve flexibility for lower-cost shipping options that have variability in delivery time. This includes Media Mail and other forms, as well as location variations such as if the buyer/seller is in Alaska/Hawaii or cross-border.

We won't evaluate handling time automatically; instead if a buyer contacts us with a complaint we'll take a look and see if the item reasonably should've been there or not.

Please note that we will continue to monitor data like feedback and the detailed seller rating related to shipping time--sellers who have unusually low scores may get some attention. No change to this policy though...it's as we've been doing for a while now.

Bottom line, as you guys allude to, the best up-front step you can take is include in your listing enough information to set buyer expectations about how long your handling time is and how long the item may take in transit. This can help stop buyers from contacting eBay in the first place. We also recognize that on occasion items just take longer than normal--this is why in some cases in the new system we will refund the buyer and not hold the seller at fault.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
domestics*diva
Posts: 12
(11 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 11:06 AM
I use PayPal shipping and Carrier pickup. Frequently the following message is the only thing displayed until the package is actually delivered (which I am told by my post office is the only scan or update that is actually required as the service is not tracking - it is delivery confirmation. In Transit updates are not guaranteed!

The U.S. Postal Service was electronically notified by the shipper on April 14, 2009 to expect your package for mailing. This does not indicate receipt by the USPS or the actual mailing date. Delivery status information will be provided if / when available. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.

I've had buyers accuse me of not shipping etc because of this message. This sometimes leads buyers to believe that the package has not been shipped, even though it has..... I've had buyers who were demanding a refund after 3 days when Parcel Post (cross country) was purchased. How can I prove an item is in transit with a message like this? The post office does not track packages, the service is Delivery Confirmation. Is this going to work against me?

How is ebay going to take this into account - are they too going to assume the package has not been shipped if the DC number doesn't get updated at every stage of the game. This is a very common message with electronic shipping!
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
buriedbybooks
Posts: 2,211
(12 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 11:08 AM
Thanks for trying, Clay. :)

Setting my buyer expectations is increasingly MORE difficult because I have to overcome messaging from eBay itself that promises a different delivery time frame than reality provides. Buyers are already shown the estimated delivery time in their EOA emails, Order Details screen etc. All of it reinforcing an impossibly optimistic delivery window for sellers who use slower USPS services.

Based on the sheer number of compaints and the current staffing levels, I'm not confident that human beings with common sense will be reviewing these disputes for 'delayed' shipments. That and my 6 years of dealing with EBay's CS staff.

What I'm still not understanding is why sellers are being held financially responsible for transit delays.

What about UPS exceptions: Inauguration Day in DC, thunderstorms in the Midwest, blizzards in Chicago???

Will trading advisories be taken into account?

Sellers are already punished for carrier performance with the DSR for shipping time. It is constantly and consistently being misused to reflect delivery time. Now we're being told that if a package is late, the buyer will get a refund and the seller will be liable for it?

Not only that, but be unlucky enough to have several late packages and the seller will see his or her account standing, search visibility, discounts, etc impacted in a negative manner for something over which they had ZERO control.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
lurch-deeann
Posts: 625
(13 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 11:14 AM
Thanks for the answer that it is only buyer-initiated. Here are my remaining questions:

Why will eBay be setting "buyer expectations" that Delivery Confirmation is tracking (USPS makes it clear it is NOT)?

If eBay will be refunding when an item is late due to the carrier, what happens when the item DOES arrive (proved with delivery confirmation) if eBay has already refunded on a shipment that was running late because of the carrier?

And tied to that: international doesn't have tracking for First Class International. And not even for Priority International Flat Rate packaging. How will that be handled? Will they automatically be assumed to be lost? And to avoid having eBay rule that it is taking too long on international, will there be a requirement that Priority Mail International then be used (but of course, not any of the flat-rate options)? I thought eBay was trying to get sellers to adopt cheaper shipping options.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
dmcgrann
Posts: 2,181
(14 of 61)

Re: Holding Sellers Accountable for Postal delays?

Apr 14, 2009 11:19 AM
domestics*diva, if you generate a SCAN form, the carrier will scan it on pickup and you'll get an acceptance scan into the USPS system. You will probably, but not always, get intermediate scans as well.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
Page: of 5

New to eBay Boards? Try a visit to our Community Discussion Boards Help and Welcome Center .

Want to visit another board? You can view our Community Overview Page or select from these lists:

Community Help Boards:

eBay Tools Boards:

Category-Specific Boards:

General Discussion Boards:


Feedback Forum | Discussion Boards | Groups | Answer Center | Chat Rooms | Community Values

About eBay | Announcements | Security Center | Resolution Center | eBay Toolbar | Policies | Government Relations | Site Map | Help
Copyright © 1995-2009 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
eBay official time
hosted by LiveWorld