It is a shame and just another oversite on "bay's" bright ideas. She will get to return and I will get negative f/b that will stick for a year.  I sure wish there was away to nip it in the butt.

Did you mean RMA? Return Merchandise Authorization?

Could you explain why you would pay more if you charge a restocking fee.

RGA OR RMA goods or merchandise..refers to same.

This wasn't a SNAD, she "thought" they would fit her and they don't.  Second person this month who thinks they can purchase try on then return with out reading the full description on an item.

The restocking fee, I'm hoping,  will help reduce this problem.

At this point it's trail and error to see who comes out of the wood work.

May just go back to NO RETURNS but I'm trying to be open minded.

I have experience those scenarios already.  AND there lays the problem with the feedback system.

If you get a nasty buyer your basically screwed.

For instance:  why should I be stuck with negative feedback when my listing clearly stated accurate measurements and the size tag was missing.  Buyer leaves me negative for a truthful listing. HOW is that possible? Zero Communication from the jerk, just bad feedback.  I bet if Bay checked IP addresses  they would find that account associated with a deviate on my blocked list. HOW IS THIS FAIR?

Ebay Claims Feed back is an "opinion" well then "opinions" should not effect sellers so adversely.

Well...they say, the above does not violate a policy.  Isn't it a policy that buyer leave "honest" feedback.  Clearly there was a lack of integrity on the buyer and ebays part for allowing this type of behavior stand.