I have no problem with gay partnerships, but do not think it should be called "marriage." But I would never rally against gay marriage if that was on the ballot here, nor would I make a fuss about it. I feel much the same way about
partnerships between a men and women (whatever you choose to call them).
Now, that doesn’t mean I am gay, or that I support gay “partnerships.” It just means that I believe that whether gay or straight, a “partnership” should be between the “partners” (NOT the public).
Now, I suppose I should add that if there IS a God, God may choose to be involved…But, it’s d@mn sure, none of the neighbors business, and none of the governments business.
I think it should be up to the individual involved as to who they choose to marry/partnership. If you want to marry someone of a different race, someone from a different country, someone with different color eyes..it should be NONE of the voters business. If you choose to live with someone, but NOT marry them, it should be NONE of the voters business!
What I object to, is my government, and my tax dollars subsidizing marriages of any type! In other words, I think income tax should be based on Income (NOT marital status).
Once again, I consider marriage/partnerships to be a “personal choice” (much the same as deciding whether to become a vegetarian, or a Mormon
!
Must use Buy It Now and PayPal.
)
ha 
)
)
)
