From collectibles to cars, buy and sell all kinds of items on eBay
aAdvanced Search
Attention small business or part-time sellers near Atlanta:
Learn from experts and network with sellers at
eBay: On Location in Atlanta, March 19-20
SPACE IS LIMITED! REGISTER NOW
Topic Archived This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Last Post Feb 4, 2009 12:27 AM by: lashopaholic
Replies: 127
)
lashopaholic
Posts: 513

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 10, 2009 10:43 PM
I know that there are several threads on this - but I didn't know which one to post it on.

Most of you know I test products using a Niton XRF analyzer. I've tested more than 75,000 products by now, and wanted to share the results with those of you concerned about the CPSIA. I've tested toys, household products, new clothing, used clothing, textiles, sheets, ceramics, etc.

If you aren't familiar with the XRF, it is a portable analyzer that can be used to test household products including clothing for lead and other elements. I can even test your diamond ring and determine whether it is actually a diamond (although not the 4 Cs).

So, here is what I've found in terms of items on clothing that have failed (exceeded the August 300 ppm limit that will be effective in 8/14/09) - some of these numbers differ from a previous post I did because I went and reviewed my testing results:

(1) Brass can fail, particularly when it is a buckle or purse joining (and in household keys too) - usually has lead at 15,000 ppm;
(2) Some metal zipper pulls fail, particularly decorative ones found on girl's clothing - those lacy or filigree looking ones - have found as high as 28,000 ppm;
(3) Crystals fail, such as adornment on dresses;
(4) Some rhinestones fail;
(5) Some decals on fronts of shirt fail - the vinyl ones;
(6) I have had red dyed textiles fail;
(7) Those slighly opalescent or pearl look or shell look buttons frequently fail, anywhere from 1,400 ppm and up;
(8) Faux pearl adornments frequently fail;
(9) Some zipper and zipper stops fail;
(10) Some painted on decorations have failed - it seemed like silk screen to me, but I'm not really an expert on that.

Jennifer
www.thesmartmama.com
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
emerald_door
Posts: 2,392
(1 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 12:34 AM
Interesting information. So, the only fabrics that have failed are some with red dyes.

Have you tested elastic, too?

Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
maggieb*designs
Posts: 1,338
(2 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 6:26 AM
Jennifer, thank you! for telling us REAL information.

I wonder if mother of pearl buttons will fail? They feel like glass instead of having a shiny coating on top of a plastic button.

maggieb!
~~~~
Never wrestle with a pig. The pig will like it and you will both get dirty.

Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
peek*a*boutique
Posts: 40,589
(3 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 6:44 AM
Have you tested any childrens fabric like you would buy in a fabric store. Quilting cottons etc, not already made things.

Looks like there's not much without the potential of lead. Most of what we have has one of those embellishments on it or a zipper etc.
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
cncrichmond
Posts: 1,285
(4 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 7:01 AM
Yes thanks Jennifer!

and sorry to jump on your thread re XRF analyzer test results, but I wanted to let everyone know I tried those LeadCheck swabs that Betty mentioned on four of my items - I know they are not at all the same as the XRF analyzer, but the website stated that they sensitive to 1ug on solid surfaces/2ppm in liquid and one of the recommended uses was on lunchboxes(!) so I thought it would help me decide how to "manage my risk" as Wendy so aptly put it :)

I tried them on the bright pink boots that Gap released this past fall (with Preppy Prints etc), Gymboree's red Holland Days clogs, the gumball machine hair clips from Gymboree's Lots of Dots line (not the chihuahua though), and the apple charm on the Prep School plaid tote - if you are familiar with any of these items you know they are very bright red or pink and I picked them because I figured out of 100 items I have those would be in the top 5 most likely for lead - I didn't have any positive results, not one of the swabs turned red WHERE I SWABBED...

...and that was the biggest problem using the swabs - for example, I swabbed the Gap boots on the vinyl near the zip, but not the zip itself or the sole, interior etc - and you can not use them on/near fabric - the swabs mix a powder and clear liquid which then turns dark yellow and will stain any fabric - but if those Holland Days clogs didn't give me a positive I don't know what would :^O (joke!)

I want to STRESS that this is just me using a home testing kit, not a professional/regular tester, as I am a home-based RESELLER of USED items :-D - at minimum these "tests" should be replicated, and I'm interested in what you, Jennifer, think of the sensitivity and even possible legality of these home kits for resellers - just wanted to pass along my experience with the swabs to anyone who was interested...I plan to try some rain boots too, and a tiara I have with rhinestones but need to get more swabs (they have them at Lowes for 2swabs/4 tests for $6 but I saw some on here cheaper...)

I am wondering too if places like Gymboree/Gap have been doing the XRF testing like Jennifer has been doing for other(?) manufacturers on recent past lines and intend to post recalls - could be a big loss of $ if they did, or maybe not in the long run? just wondering...
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
janeytom
Posts: 73
(5 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 7:21 AM
Great info. I can't beleive how many people are still thinking this doesn't apply to them. Your website/blog www.thesmartmama.com has clear, concise info and I recommend it to anyone wanting to keep up to date on this issue. Thanks!
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
amwillie1
Posts: 16,431
(6 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 8:35 AM
I am most curious about children's books. Have you ever tested any?


Photobucket

That was sarcasm for those incapable of discerning such things. -- *funkybaby*


-
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
4my2littleguys
Posts: 2,088
(7 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 9:02 AM
If a child does not chew on, suck, lick or eat their clothing, has it been proven that a button or zipper over the lead limit can affect them at all?

Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
princess-ca
Posts: 4,390
(8 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 9:30 AM
thank you!

Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
carolina*girl*24
Posts: 1,264
(9 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 10:09 AM
Have you tested shoes? What about crocs?
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
finnjulie
Posts: 929
(10 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 10:49 AM
Of the zippers that failed were any just plain metal zippers (like jeans) or were they all painted zippers? Thanks!

Julie
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
finnjulie
Posts: 929
(11 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 11:30 AM
Bump this thread has good information.

Julie
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
zombie*mommie
Posts: 5,227
(12 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 11:48 AM
Interesting information. Thanks!

Put this together with the information that we got from Wendy (Seattle) about the raincoats, we might be able to put together a list someday.

It would be nice to know to avoid say, Gymboree XXX line shirt and Gap XXX clogs.
Photobucket
Part Deux we don't pull posts or punches.

Photobucket
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
monkeybeans_closet
Posts: 2,251
(13 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 12:02 PM
What I would like to know is that now that things are being tested, if an item comes up as failing do the manufacturers have to issue a recall? For example, if last year's Gymbo raincoat fails an independent XRF test, is Gymbo then required to issue a recall notice for that product? If so, how far back to they have to go? 1 year? 2 years? Slippery slope here.....
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
)
auntava
Posts: 16,094
(14 of 127)

CPSIA/Used Clothing/XRF Test Results (and another thread)

Jan 11, 2009 12:10 PM
I would like to point out that just because an item fails, does not mean that all like items will fail. Gymboree could have the same item manufactured in 12 different places, all of components obtained from 43 different places.

Seriously, there is no way that anyone will be able to comply with this law unless each and every garment is tested.


Keep walking. Nothing to see here.


Never send a monster to do the work of an evil scientist.~Evil Scientist
Reply
Name:
Email:
 
Tip: To create a link - type the desired text, highlight it with your mouse and click[Click for url tag]
Tags:
 
Page: of 9

New to eBay Boards? Try a visit to our Community Discussion Boards Help and Welcome Center .

Want to visit another board? You can view our Community Overview Page or select from these lists:

Community Help Boards:

eBay Tools Boards:

Category-Specific Boards:

General Discussion Boards:


Feedback Forum | Discussion Boards | Groups | Answer Center | Chat Rooms | Community Values

About eBay | Announcements | Security Center | Policies | Government Relations | Site Map | Help | Contact us
Copyright © 1995-2010 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
eBay official time
hosted by LiveWorld