Skip to main content

New & Updated ePN Rules

New & Updated ePN Rules

(111 Replies / 16,016 Views)
New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 17, 2009 06:44 AM
If you check your email, you've probably got one from ePN talking about new and updated rules and policies. As is often the case, some of these changes are not very clear. For example... "Third party redirects for the sole purpose of masking a referring URL are no longer allowed." Does it mean the SEO redirect feature of BANS is no longer allowed? What are practical examples of this rule change?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Thin isn't thin unless it's OneLung Thin

Page: 1 of 5
 
Last Post
by joeychgo4 (215 ) View Listings
(111 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Aug 12, 2009 12:11 PM
I think the question comes down to this.

There are many many many sites out there which use a trademark name as part of their url.

A few examples:

RestoreMustangs.com
fordpartsdiscounted.com
MustangPartsOutlet.com
moparforums.com

Generaly, these arent considered trademark infringement under the domain rules.

So what is ebay's stance on this kind of thing?
(110 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Aug 5, 2009 09:28 AM
In response to the question we-auctionit has put forth, we want to point to Will’s earlier post in this thread which states that we will continue to work with publishers on Trademark issues. To onelung50’s comment, we do not treat all TOS infractions the same. Thus, some cases warrant immediate expiration such as cookie stuffing, whereas others our Network Quality Team will give you the chance to bring your promotions into compliance. As we’ve said it is up to you to understand all of the rules around Trademark Policy and make an informed decision regarding the use of domain names and site design, and possibly seek legal advice, as we are not in a position to give such guidance. Thank you for your questions as we are making a concerted effort to heighten publishers’ awareness of Trademark Policy and how it relates to promotions in eBay Partner Network.

Thanks,
Casey
(109 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Aug 5, 2009 03:33 AM
Could Ebay clarify this please
(108 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Aug 4, 2009 04:26 AM
No, the way I understand it, even if you use a trademarked brand name that the owners themselves haven't used in years and obviously don't care about, you may still be subject to discipline by ePN for using it in your primary domain name. Unless someone from ePN decides to clarify this and correct my interpretation, you should error on the side of caution because there doesn't seem to be much consistency with the way they handle TOS infractions. You may get a notice to comply, or you may get immediately terminated.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Thin isn't thin unless it's OneLung Thin

(107 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Aug 3, 2009 11:20 PM
"If you run a website with ePN ads on it under a domain name such as cheapmakitadrills. com, and Makita never asks you to stop... then your OK, but should they ever ask for a licensing agreement or for you to stop, you will be required to comply in order to continue running ePN ads on this domain... essentially, I don't think ePN wants outlaws in the affiliate program."

Is this the gist of it?
Example; Say I have a site, ilovemywii.com.
On it a big disclaimer stating I have nothing to do at all with Nintendo as I am just a fan site.
Would ebay have a problem with that or would they only get involved if Nintendo sends them a notice to stop displaying eBay ads on this domain?
(106 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 28, 2009 07:07 AM
As long as the redirect only goes from your site to eBay and doesn't hide, alter or remove the referrer information, you're good.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Thin isn't thin unless it's OneLung Thin

(105 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 28, 2009 07:01 AM
I have a question about the Wordbay plugin... What it does is not a third-party redirect, like tinyurl, but the urls are base64 encoded.

It that against the new rules?
(104 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 26, 2009 11:49 AM
> The new policy does not require existing affiliates to validate their domains. Are you guys validating your domains anyway? Yeah, I probably will. I've only got a small handful of relevant domains, so it shouldn't be difficult. -h



[Some Handy Aggregated Reference Info for ePN Affiliates and eBay Developers]

(103 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 26, 2009 07:38 AM
The new policy does not require existing affiliates to validate their domains. Are you guys validating your domains anyway?
(102 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 22, 2009 05:26 PM
QUESTION REGARDING KEYWORD USE IN PAID SEARCH

Ok so if I have a website and I want to direct paid search traffic to it and I have affiliate links on the site for ebay and promote the program there, although bidding on ebay.com or www.ebay.com or ebay understandably would be not allowed and it would be irrelevant and useless to use ebay in the display url,

Could I however elect to use relevant phrases such as "ebay
+ something" that is relevant to the content on the site, like if I am promoting acru's could I bid on "join ebay" or "ebay registration information"?

A good example is buy.com's affiliate program. They do not allow use of buy.com in keywords for paid search but they DO allow any combinations buy.com + something, as an example to help their publishers succeed...

Thoughts from ebay affiliate mgr would be appreciated!

Also second question, has there been any thought on bringing back the ebay stores affiliate program?
(101 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 22, 2009 10:23 AM
Link to your site.


----------------------------------------- Need Cash? Give us a Ring! Visit a Pawn Shop Today!

(100 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 22, 2009 09:49 AM
what about Twitter's users?

you can't insert long url, since twitter has 140char limit for entire message, not to mention twitter will itself would use 3rd party url wrappers such as tinyurl or bitly and make url shorter

so that's against their new rules?
(99 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 03:16 PM
Subdomains are just an extension like a directory of the actual URL.


Technically brandname.domain.com is a host name not a subdomain. In practice they are both used in the same fashion as folders in a URL by many places - to subdivide a website. eBay's shop.ebay.com and motors.ebay.com are examples. But in some cases, different hosts are completely different websites.

Reality is that if you're violating trademarks it doesn't matter how you've formatted your URL, you can still be sued.

eBay, and the legal community as a whole places more importance on domain names for trademarks than web pages. They're treated as if a domain name is the same as a brick and mortar store and a web page is just a shelf in the store. Host names probably fall more in the middle but lean strongly toward domains.
(98 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 02:34 PM
> Could you have brandname.url. com or is this not acceptable now?

If I understand correctly, brandname.url is not against the rules, so long as the holder of the trademark/brand allows it. This is not ePN's jurisdiction. It is between you and the trademark holder. ePN's concern is with the use of THEIR trademarks in your domain name/URL. If you run a website with ePN ads on it under a domain name such as cheapmakitadrills. com, and Makita never asks you to stop... then your OK, but should they ever ask for a licensing agreement or for you to stop, you will be required to comply in order to continue running ePN ads on this domain... essentially, I don't think ePN wants outlaws in the affiliate program.
(97 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 02:13 PM
Subdomains are just an extension like a directory of the actual URL. Uh... no they're not. Not even close.
(96 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 12:54 PM
If a brand name is ok after the 3rd slash where do sub domains stand?

Could you have brandname.url. com or is this not acceptable now?

I know some companies pursue people with their trademark in the actual URL but I think the law on the use of sub domains is allot vaguer. Subdomains are just an extension like a directory of the actual URL.

Anyways some clarification on this would be great.
(95 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 10:15 AM
Thank you for that clarification on trademarks and branding. Its not as big of a concern as lots of folks think it is unless you are blatantly disregarding trademark owners wishes. Just move the site to another domain if they want you to give up the domain name.

Just a comment: Seeing ePN say will work things out is huge. It shows a partnership not man against "The Man".

As I use to say in the construction business is. "You get further with sugar than vinegar" to get what you want.

As I understood wordpress blogs hosted on wordpress where never allowed ads? Links to a site are cool, but you can't put adsense there right?
(94 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 08:25 AM
I find it interesting that eBay's affiliate program is tied to countless "third-party" sites like HubPages and yet they're now asking affiliates to remove any trace of those ads if we don't outright OWN the site. This seems extremely arbitrary to say the least confusing. We need to go to law school in order to understand the legalese here at ePN when new rules are implemented.

So what gives? Ning offers creators of networks a way to earn income by paying $24.95 a month to freely run ads associated with the content of the network Here's how NING explains their Premium Service:

Go Ad-Free ($US 24.95/month): You can opt to run your own ads, using any ad server, or remove the ads entirely. If you do run your own ads, all revenue generated goes directly to you.

Because none of us here own NING, does this mean we have to remove all associated affiliate links there as well? I would go into my HubPages and Ning site and make the changes required of me, but I hesitate because much of what ePN is asking us to do does not seem well thought out (and will possibly change again).

Additionally, not all ePN affiliates have their own eBay stores or auctions, so if I have a MySpace page or HubPage centered around a certain topic with quality content, where's the incentive to advertise eBay?!? 100% of all Squidoo lenses are affected by the new rules as well.

Clarification is desperately needed here. The following is what is stated when attaching your affiliate ID with a HubPage:

eBay Affiliate ID Help
You'll have to sign up for the eBay Partner Network at affiliates.ebay.com. They'll ask you to fill out a series of forms with your name, address and payment information, and to describe what your site is all about. It should just take a few minutes, especially if you follow these step by step instructions.

After you are signed up, you need to enter a numeric eBay Affiliates Campaign Id (usually a 10 digit number) in the space above. You can create a special campaign just for HubPages, or use the default campaign that comes with your account. Look under the campaigns tab after you've signed in to your eBay Partner Network account.

Important: eBay has a fairly stringent affiliate program approval processes. They also seem to be denying applications from certain countries. We recommend only applying for eBay if your hubs are generating a reasonable amount of traffic and you intend to place eBay products prominently in your hubs.
(93 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 08:04 AM
What we’re really trying to avoid are cases where sites in eBay Partner Network cause consumer confusion around whether the brand owner is sponsoring, endorsing, or affiliated with the site and its operator.

Ok, so if I'm understanding Will's post correctly, it's not against epn policy to have something like:

http: // mygenericdomainname . com / brand name

Even though it may not be recommended, it's not against policy, right?

It would be hard to rank for brand names without having them in the URL for SEO purposes.

What if we were to put disclaimers on our site's footer for example that states that all images, names, etc. are in no way associated with our site and it's partners. Something legal to that effect?

Most of my sites use brand name somewhere in the url although never in the main domain url, so I want to get his cleared up soon.

Also, I would say almost all ecommerce sites use brand names in their url at some point. Not allowing this would just seem pointless IMO.
(92 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 05:28 AM
"can I have a banner link to my ebay store on my myspace page that goes directly to my ebay store page?" The way I understand it, if the link you place on your MySpace page goes directly to your eBay store and has affiliate codes in it, the answer is NO. But, this seems to be an ePN ruling, not an eBay rule. If I were you I would just remove the affiliate portion of the link and make it a direct (non-affiliated) link to your eBay store. You won't make any affiliate commissions from the link, but you'll still have the exposure for your store.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Thin isn't thin unless it's OneLung Thin

(91 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 05:02 AM
I just want to point out to those in charge, you are about to lose major income.
As a writer, I write for hub pages(a 3rd party site)

I am now in the process, along with thousands of other hubbers, pulling all of our ebay ads.

I will bet you see a drastic drop in ebay sales because of this manuever.

Well off to drop tons of those ads:
http://hubpages.com/profile/Froggy213
(90 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 04:05 AM
Hi, I just have one stupid question, I havent read a distinct answer to it yet. can I have a banner link to my ebay store on my myspace page that goes directly to my ebay store page? Thanks


(89 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 21, 2009 03:48 AM
What if we get permission to use a brand name in a URL extension, logo, etc on our website, are you going to view these on a case-by-case basis? Let's say I'm trying to push the inventory of a company that doesn't carry a storefront themselves, I'm sure some of them wouldn't mind getting their brand name out in as many ways as possible. I of course, would get permission from the brand owner themselves, and not of eBay who is somehow policing the copyright of others.


Hi. I stare at computer screens for a living.

(88 of 111)
Re: New & Updated ePN Rules
Jul 20, 2009 11:14 PM
Thanks to everyone for asking good questions to help clarify how the new policies affect publishers. As there are a number of different topics, we’re going to post over the next few days with answers addressing the various common topics that have been raised.

There have been a lot of questions on the trademark policy. The issue here is that the use of brands as part of domain names for sites that engage in commercial activity may infringe the trademark rights of brand owners. As members of the eBay Partner Network we need you to keep this in mind and do what you need to abide by the intellectual property rights of third parties.

Unfortunately, we can’t give legal advice on this one and there’s no simple answer to all of the specific questions that we’ve received on this thread. What we’re really trying to avoid are cases where sites in eBay Partner Network cause consumer confusion around whether the brand owner is sponsoring, endorsing, or affiliated with the site and its operator. So basically, if you think the brand you’re promoting might not like what you’re doing (i.e., using a brand name in a URL extension then using their logo, brand, etc. on the landing page) then obviously stay away from doing it. If you don’t know or have questions on whether what you’re doing with a particular brand is acceptable from a legal perspective, then you should consult a trademark attorney.

In terms of enforcement, our plan is to be reasonable and give existing affiliates enough time to work through this specific policy (this could extend to a few months). In specific cases where we receive notice from a brand owner or see a specific issue, we will work with publishers to try to remedy the issue (as we have been doing for some time now).

We’ll continue to post on other topics throughout the week.

Will
Pages: 5 - [ 1 2 3 4 5 | Next ]
To the top