|
I see so much analysis among a few regular boardies in store forums about "possible" things to come. My question is: Has Ebay every instituted a change on the UK site that DIDN'T eventually make it to .com in at least a very similar form? Seems to me, pretty much every single change UK sellers on the UK site has had to endure since Donahoe took over as CEO eventually became a reality here on .com. Am I wrong? And, it seems every change that has been implemented on UK, was said by the collective masses of U.S. sellers that those changes wouldn't fly on .com, BUT, Ebay implemented the same, or very similar changes here anyway....from Paypal fund holds for sellers with less than 100 sales, Paypal 10% float fund holds for certain sellers based on paypal determined seller, sales volume & product criteria, Best Match1 &2, SIS in core, SIS not in core, listing & fvf changes, elimination of most listing upgrades, elimination of seller's ability to indicate in listing acceptance of paper payments, capped shipping in certain categories, current feedback system, Adcommerce, advertising of offsite retailers, cross promotion adverts of other sellers appearing in listings (both active and closed) etc..... While not all those changes were proven effective, some of which have already been revamped since implementation, the fact is........ Ebay did/has pretty much implemented every change that was first tried and tested on .uk site. IMO, the last round of changes Ebay implemented on UK for stores is more than likely to most "probable" outcome for stores on .com, which includes: 1) Elimination of store inventory format (bye-bye 3 cent listing fees) 2) All store listing in core as FP30 or GTC at a MUCH MUCH higher cost per listing. 3) Bulk of SIS buried in core getting little to no real exposure or real benefit in being in core despite 1000% increase in listing fees converting from non core 4) Monthly store subscription prices increased considerably 5) End result...Ebay makes a fortune in failure revenue and sellers with stores gain very little REAL sales traction due to core being flooded with listings and much of that store inventory being buried for almost the entire 30 day duration (especially in categories that already have many 1000s to hundreds of thousands of core listings.) 6) Average seller realizes modest rise in core sales, but not enough to cover added cost of converting all listings from 3 cent store inventory to much higher priced core listings & getting limited core exposure. Thus net GMV profits shrink for most sellers in most categories while Ebay's makes it's fortunes on failure revenue. That appears to be the current state of UK stores, and IMO is the scenario here soon. IF Ebay has a similar structure as the current UK store model, the only sellers who may ultimately benefit in the long run are those sellers that list mainly in categories that currently have very few active listings in core. Rob
|