cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Why can't this happen to me?

He Paid $30 for a Drawing. It Could Be a Renaissance Work Worth Millions.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/24/arts/albrecht-durer-drawing-discovered.html

 

Message 1 of 10
latest reply
9 REPLIES 9

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

Michelle:  I have two answers for you. one more sarcastic than the other:

 

1.  You know old paper so well that you would know this was not a 1970s reprint, and would be suspicious of the seller trying to pull something on you.

 

2.  You obviously have a new york times subscription.  All of us common folks cannot read the article without signing up for a subscription at the outlandish price of $1.  Therefore you have no other responses.

 

 

Seriously, while I do not know 100+ year old paper as well as you, in my area of baseball cards I can detect a copy by looking at the age of the paper.

Message 2 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

Mike,  actually, I don't have a NY Times subscription, so I don't know how I'm able to see the article when no one else can.   I'll try doing a cut and paste:

 

He Paid $30 for a Drawing. It Could Be a Renaissance Work Worth Millions.

A man bought a yellowing picture of the Virgin Mary and Child at an estate sale in Massachusetts. Experts believe it is by the renowned German artist Albrecht Dürer.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 
 
imagineink_0-1640830471017.jpeg

 

imagineink_1-1640830471045.jpeg

 

A drawing believed to be by Albrecht Dürer titled “The Virgin and Child With a Flower on a Grassy Bench” on display in London in November.Credit...Leon Neal/Getty Images
Dec. 24, 2021

In 2016, a man picked up two items at an estate sale in Concord, Mass.: a fake jade necklace for $1 and a small drawing of the Virgin Mary and Child for $30.

He tucked the drawing away in his house, where he showed it to the occasional guest, his friend would later say. Something about it was intriguing, even though he did not know where it came from.

This month, a panel of experts at the British Museum in London delivered a stunning answer: The artwork, titled “The Virgin and Child With a Flower on a Grassy Bench,” was an undiscovered drawing by Albrecht Dürer, a renowned German artist born in 1471.

The man, whose identity has not been revealed, had made one of the most extraordinary discoveries of Renaissance artwork in years, the experts said. The drawing might be worth tens of millions of dollars.

 
 

The declaration that the drawing was the work of Dürer — an assessment that is not universally shared among researchers — came about as a result of a chance meeting and the efforts of a dogged art dealer who amassed thousands of frequent-flier miles tracking down an answer.

First, the meeting. The owner of the drawing was friends with Brainerd Phillipson, who runs a rare-book shop in Holliston, Mass. In 2019, Clifford Schorer, an entrepreneur and art dealer from Boston, stopped by the shop to purchase a last-minute gift.

 

They started chatting about art, and then Mr. Phillipson mentioned that his friend had what they thought could be a Dürer drawing, Mr. Phillipson said in an interview this week. The initials A.D. at the bottom of the drawing were “rather a tell,” he said.

“No, you have an Albrecht Dürer engraving,” Mr. Schorer replied, as he would later recount. Engravings are usually stamped onto a paper and are quicker to make than drawings, which are more rare and valuable.

Noting that Dürer drawings are extremely rare and that he thought all were accounted for, Mr. Schorer said he told Mr. Phillipson, “As someone who knows Albrecht Dürer in and out, it’s impossible.”

 

Eleven days later, the owner texted pictures of the artwork to Mr. Schorer, who said he drove straight to the man’s house, where, he said, the man and his wife lived modestly. Mr. Schorer sat down at the kitchen table to look at the piece.

“It was either a masterpiece or the greatest forgery I had ever seen,” he said.

Mr. Schorer, who specializes in recovering lost art, paid the man a $100,000 advance to sell the drawing, he said. (The exact terms are confidential, but both will get money when it sells, he said.) Mr. Schorer would lose his advance if the work turned out to be a forgery.

Mr. Phillipson said his friend, the owner of the drawing, declined to comment.

Three days later, Mr. Schorer boarded a flight to England to rush the drawing into the hands of Jane McAusland, a paper conservator who advises museums, dealers and auction houses. She did not respond to emails this week from The Times.

Three weeks after his visit, Ms. McAusland told him that the drawing had been stained with tea or coffee to make it look like an antique, Mr. Schorer said. But he asked her to look again, and she replied by email the next day with an image. He clicked on it, and the picture showed a translucent light shining through the paper.

“It had the trident watermark, which is only in Albrecht Dürer’s drawings,” he said. “My mind was blown.”

Dürer’s preferred medium was a special paper made by his patron, Jacob Fugger, one of the richest men who ever lived. Only Dürer’s workshop had access to that paper, which bore Fugger’s signature watermark, according to Christof Metzger, a Dürer specialist who was on the panel of experts who authenticated the drawing this month.

 
 

Mr. Schorer said he met Mr. Metzger, the chief curator at the Albertina Museum in Vienna, on his tour of 14 cities around the world to try to authenticate the drawing. Over more than two years, he said, he met a slate of experts, all but one of whom agreed that the drawing was an original Dürer.

Clues like the paper, the pen strokes and the style of the Madonna suggested to Mr. Metzger that this was not a forgery, Mr. Metzger said.

He dated the piece to 1503, when Dürer made a similar depiction of the Virgin Mary on a grassy bench. Mr. Metzger believes the artist was drawing ideas for a 1506 watercolor titled “The Virgin With a Multitude of Animals.”

The newly discovered drawing was the first “complete, finalized composition” of Dürer’s to be discovered since 1932, Mr. Metzger said.

The artist’s works have long been collected because of his mastery of both granular details and hallucinatory fantasies, Mr. Metzger said, “and for this reason, a new, absolutely unknown work is absolutely once in the lifetime.”

Not all are convinced, however, that the work was drawn by Dürer.

Fritz Koreny, a senior researcher at the Institute for Art History at University of Vienna, believes it was made by a Dürer apprentice, Hans Baldung. He declined to elaborate, because he is working on his own publication about the drawing. He said, however, “All the significant details speak for Baldung.”

 

Dr. Koreny estimated that if Baldung made the drawing, its value would be only up to a quarter of what it would be worth if Dürer drew it.

No matter who created it, the artwork had traveled from Germany to a noble family in Italy to the Louvre Museum and private collectors in France before it wound up in Massachusetts, Mr. Metzger said — a journey that was reported earlier by The Boston Globe.

Jean-Paul Carlhian, an architect, took the piece to Massachusetts sometime after his family acquired it in 1912, Dr. Metzger said. At some point in the last century, the family decided the drawing was not a real Dürer, Mr. Schorer said. That is most likely how it ended up at the Carlhian family’s estate sale that the unidentified buyer of the drawing attended in 2016.

Mr. Carlhian’s daughter Penny Carlhian declined to comment.

Dürer churned out piece after piece until he died in 1528. About 1,500 have been accounted for, Mr. Metzger said. Only 24 are known to remain in private collections, which is what makes the newly discovered drawing so special, he said.

For now, the drawing is being housed at Agnews Gallery in London. It will be displayed next month at the Colnaghi gallery in New York.

Mr. Schorer and the drawing’s owner stand to make a significant windfall when the drawing goes on sale, probably sometime in the new year. He declined to speculate on its value, but he said it could be the most valuable work by a Renaissance master to hit the market since a chalk sketch by Raphael sold for nearly $48 million in 2012.

 
 

Agnews Gallery plans to ask for an “eight-figure sum” for the drawing, according to a statement from the gallery last month.

Mr. Schorer has traveled the world to learn about art, but he remains astonished that the greatest piece he helped discover was found, as he put it, “in my backyard.”

“Life is downhill from that moment forward,” he said. “I’ll never have an experience like that again.”

 

  

Message 3 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

Michelle:  I am glad I asked you to repost the Times article.  This was more than a story about finding a copy of the constitution in a picture frame.

 

The broker has spend tons of time and money to both authenticate and then publicize the art.  The idea to pay the owner to be able to sell is an interesting one, I had never heard of that.

 

If believed, the broker sounds like he has dedicated his life's efforts to this one piece of art.  I hope it works out for him.  I did not read much about scientific detective work, such as carbon dating.  Does that question the honesty of the broker ot is it a question of the journalistic abilities of the author?

 

Thanks again.

 

 

Message 4 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

I don't know how much they can test without damaging the artwork. Certainly the paper, and pencil would need to be tested to determine the relative age. Also, what provenance is there of this drawing?

 

What records exist that determines that the artist actually created this work and it is not a forgery?  It could test to the time period but be a forgery, or a copy made be a student of the artist.

Message 5 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

The most telling clue that it's an authentic Durer (I don't know how to typographically add those two dots on top of the "u") is the watermark on the paper.   The trident watermark is tied to Durer's patron, Jacob Fugger, and only Durer's workshop had access to that paper.

 

The provenance is uber interesting:  From the article ... 

Jean-Paul Carlhian, an architect, took the piece to Massachusetts sometime after his family acquired it in 1912, Dr. Metzger said. At some point in the last century, the family decided the drawing was not a real Dürer, Mr. Schorer said. That is most likely how it ended up at the Carlhian family’s estate sale that the unidentified buyer of the drawing attended in 2016.

Mr. Carlhian’s daughter Penny Carlhian declined to comment.

 

I bet the poor daughter who sold it an estate sale (for only $30!!!!) is pulling out her hair right now! 

 

 

Message 6 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

That find was huge news here as we're in Massachusetts! 

 

I know, @imagine.ink . Why can't we find this kind of woo-hoo?!?!

albertabrightalberta
Volunteer Community Mentor

Message 7 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

Because you're too nice?

Message 8 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?















Michelle: The Antiques Roadshow episode that played this week locally was from Wadsworth Mansion, I believe in Connecticut, had a segment featuring a Durer woodcut.  Not as expensive as the original you pointed out, but still an expensive find.  Again the canvas seemed in remarkable condition for the age.  That could be more evidence of the quality of paper Durer used.






 

 

 

 

Message 9 of 10
latest reply

Re: Why can't this happen to me?

It can. 

A $2 million (2000 US$) Picasso was found in the attic of an East Cleveland home.

This sort of thing happens all the time.  

Fortune favors the prepared: if you don't know what a 5,000 year old Greek coin looks like, how will you know if you get one in change from the local bodega?

Message 10 of 10
latest reply